Warning: unserialize() expects parameter 1 to be string, array given in /home/votewrst/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 423

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/votewrst/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc:423) in /home/votewrst/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 579

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/votewrst/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc:423) in /home/votewrst/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 580

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/votewrst/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc:423) in /home/votewrst/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 581

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/votewrst/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc:423) in /home/votewrst/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 582
Idiot Lawyer Danielle Aidala Thinks VFTW/Stern Can Be Successfully Sued | Drupal
Home

Idiot Lawyer Danielle Aidala Thinks VFTW/Stern Can Be Successfully Sued

warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/votewrst/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc:423) in /home/votewrst/public_html/includes/common.inc on line 141.
Sun, 04/01/2007 - 17:52 — thefunnystone

This is hysterical. On The O'Reilly Factor, civil litigator Danielle Aidala makes incredibly stupid arguments about how she could sue this website. The arguments are actually even stupider than the rationale from the 12 year olds who write to us, so it's a pretty funny way to waste five minutes if you're bored.

Comments

Sun, 04/08/2007 - 21:59 — Nicole13579

She is so stupid. We're

She is so stupid. We're learning our rights in History class this week, and you can say whatever you like as long as you're not taking away another person's rights. And VFTW isn't. We're merely asking people to vote for Sanjaya, and that's all. And, when she talks about how other good singers get kicked off, i have to say:if people liked them, they would've stayed. There are plenty of good singers still here, and so many good singers don't even get to audition for the judges. This show is simply a reality show, and this lady is an idiot!
Sun, 04/08/2007 - 03:53 — provocateur

It would be fantastic if she

It would be fantastic if she lurked this site and realized how moronic she is.
Sat, 04/07/2007 - 03:56 — munchie

she is a moron on multiple

she is a moron on multiple fronts. but clearly of a 'former prosecutor' mind. good for her on getting a tertiary cash-in, i guess. such flawed theories.
Thu, 04/05/2007 - 22:18 — ellec_optimist

OK i have to say that i hate

OK i have to say that i hate this website for all it represents. It's stupid and petty. Why waste ur time trying to keep Sanjaya on the show. He was a decent singer at the begginning but now he is becoming worse and worse each week. and about the comment about the people who write being rationale 12 years olds, come on. We are simply American Idol fans who hate seing u guys sabatoge the results of the show. If u really think Sanjaya is the worst then why are u helping him win, i bet u guys probably wanna be able to laugh at him when his voice is on the radio too. Well that is just dumb. and if anyone is immature it's u guys. -ellec_optimist
Wed, 04/04/2007 - 18:27 — crazytom

I sent this link to my

I sent this link to my lawyer friend to get his insight into the merits of the case. His reply: All I know is that, even though I don't watch American Idol, and have never voted for an American Idol, this attorney has convinced me to start voting every week for Sanjaya just so I know she'll be out there getting her panties all in a bunch over it Crazy Tom
Wed, 04/04/2007 - 07:35 — sassyangel1986

This lady is ridiculous.

This lady is ridiculous. "Malicious intent" and "the first ammendment doesn't protect everything"?! OK, if the kkk and nazis can invoke free speech rights, what is she wasting her time talking about vftw and american idol for? I am pretty sure if hate speech is protected then wftw would be too. :-P
Wed, 04/04/2007 - 01:44 — genitalherpes69

Someone needs to tell

Someone needs to tell O'reilly to STFU! He needs to go back to having phone sex with his staff about falafels and that little loofa thing.
Tue, 04/03/2007 - 19:34 — idolfan001

I'm sure her legal career is

I'm sure her legal career is over once people see that appearance on O'Reilly. As civil litigator myself, her arguments made no sense to me at all. For starters, American Idol would need to show some injury in order to support that claim. AI has suffered no injury and no economic loss, but rather, I would say, has benefitted from the publicity. I mean Sanjaya is the most contoversial idol ever. Howard Stern may have urged people to vote for Sanjaya, but he essentially gave FREE PUBLICITY to AI. Secondly, Howard Stern (and VFTW) is allowed to say almost whatever he wants on the radio, subject to certain limitations. Telling listeners to vote for Sanjaya does not fall into the limitations on free speech that Danielle whats-her-name mentions. Third- NO one is compelled to vote for Sanjaya, they do it by their own free will. Finally, the loss of opportunity argument- Generally, many courts do not easily recognize claims for "lost opportunity" and the contestants would really have to prove their loss with certainty. And, looking back on past seasons where the winners were not necessarily the early favorites and where guys like Chris Daughtry got voted of in 4th place, it becomes very difficult to prove that any contestant really "lost out" on being the idol because Sanjaya stayed another week.
Tue, 04/03/2007 - 21:17 — idolfan001

Also, lets not forget that

Also, lets not forget that Nigel Lythgoe himself said that with 30 million votes, VFTW is really like a fly buzzing around a cow. In essence, the idol producers are admitting publicly themselves that VFTW has no impact on voting. I bet Fox chose to put some inexperienced young attorney on O'Reilly just to generate more controversy. They know there is no real possibility of a suit and they just wanted to start a rumor that Fox may be suing VFTW, just like they put Sanjaya in the top 24, just to generate buzz and controversy. At the end of the day, FOX producers put Sanjaya in the top 24. There are thousands of contestants and producers have full discretion on who they let through. Don't tell me that Sanjaya was more talented than thousands of others. The producers, NOT the viewers, chose him to get to the top 24. How can they possibly claim that VFTW or Howard Stern posed such a strong interferance with the AI franchise? NO- when producers turned away other talented singers like Tammy or Bailey Brown in the place of Antonella Barba, the producers can't honestly say that this is a singing competition. So then what exactly is VFTW interfering with? AI is still on TV. More people watch it now because of Howard Stern and VFTW. So what if more people are voting for Sanjaya? Isn't that the point of the show, that people vote for who they want to? You can't create a reality show which allows the public to vote from a narrow pool of contestants whom YOU (the producers) have selected and then cry when they vote for the antagonist, whom YOU decided to put through to the top 24 at your own discretion. Boo-hoo, cry me a river, people and stop pointing fingers at VFTW. Its the producers who hand-picked Sanjaya and put him there for you to vote for. Maybe you should sue THEM for fraud, trickery and wanton and willful disregard for the sanctity of prime-time reality entertainment...
Tue, 04/03/2007 - 22:03 — Paul

Idolfan001 You hit it RIGHT

Idolfan001 You hit it RIGHT ON with paragraph one! That says it all! (and all the rest too). Paul Los Angeles
Tue, 04/03/2007 - 19:50 — idolhater

I have to agree. There are

I have to agree. There are several hurdles to get past summary judgement on this one. 1) Idol itself is making more money so there are no damages to Idol or Fox; 2) Class action, are you kidding? The point of a class action is to sue on behalf of a class of people because the class is too large to name as individual plaintiffs. American Idol and Fox are not a class, neither are the contestants because there are a limited number of contestants who can each be named as plaintiffs. 3) Causation - people vote of their own free will, no one compels you to vote. It's like saying a boycott is illegal because it interferes with a business relationship or creates a lost opportunity. What law school did she attend???
Sat, 04/07/2007 - 04:15 — munchie

apparently Fordham. she's

apparently Fordham. she's basking in the glory of her husband and her former life as a prosecutor, where you are encouraged to make ridiculous assertions with little interference given the apparent authority.
Tue, 04/03/2007 - 22:23 — idolfan001

"Which law school did she

"Which law school did she attend?" I would rather ask which state let her pass their bar exam???
Tue, 04/03/2007 - 12:02 — elvenjewel

Holy cow! Check out this

Holy cow! Check out this website: http://www.stickittostern.com/ Write your congressmen! Sanjaya Malakar might WIN and we need congressional action to STOP him!! Sheesh!! "Why can't we just all get along?" -- Rodney King
Tue, 04/03/2007 - 22:31 — idolfan001

Congressional action to stop

Congressional action to stop Sanjaya Malakar from winning Idol??? Huh?
Tue, 04/03/2007 - 15:18 — angry_ferret_jones

Jesus what douche-bags.

Jesus what douche-bags. That site is almost as funny as what's in their pants. 1. Stop "Vote for the Worst" campaign. - Howard Stern has nothing to do with the VFTW website, you idiots. 2. Send a written and video apology for "Vote for the Worst" campaign to American Idol producers. - Howard Stern has nothing to do with the VFTW website, you idiots. 3. Give any American Idol contestant voted of show because of "Vote for the Worst" campaign $20,000 as an "goodwill" gester. - First of all, the word you are so painfully trying to spell is 'Gesture.' As in "I made a gesture to you with my middle finger." Secondly (he said again) - Howard Stern has nothing to do with the VFTW website, you idiots. 4. Apologize on air to wacpacker "Eric the Actor" for "Vote for the Worst" campaign. - It is spelled Wack-Pack, and (again) Howard Stern has nothing to do with the VFTW website, you idiots. 5. Never watch or Tivo American Idol again. - It's a deal.
Tue, 04/03/2007 - 11:41 — elvenjewel

A class action suit on

A class action suit on behalf of the AMERICAN PUBLIC? That's almost as ridiculous as Congress passing a formal declaration of war on "terror". "Terror" isn't a country -- hence, it is an unconstitutional declaration of war. But hey, if Congress can do it, maybe this lady thinks she can get away with it too! "Why can't we just all get along?" -- Rodney King
Tue, 04/03/2007 - 03:41 — Paul

Here's how FOX News

Here's how FOX News announced this "douche" addition to their legal staff. She's obviously a regular and not just a fligh-by-night guest: \ Quote The Judge [Sr. Judicial Analyst Andrew Napolitano] also joined us — as did Kirsten Powers and a new addition Danielle Aidala, a former prosecutor and current medical malpractice attorney. (She is married to our buddy and frequent guest, Arthur Aidala.) We think she may be the better half! (Just kidding, Arthur.) \ Unquote Well, maybe we should all tremble 'cause her hubby is also a Manhattan criminal defense attorney... Check his credentials here: http://www.aidalalaw.com/html/manhattan-criminal-defense-attorneys.html Ambulance chasers? Paul Los Angeles
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 21:46 — lyricalsoul

What is the definition of a

What is the definition of a campaign? And when did it become illegal? How can a person selected (not voted) from thousands to compete in the final 24 not legitimately have a chance to win? I come here for a good laugh but it’s getting stranger than fiction and starting to scare me when I see these “educated” people talk like this… I’ve got a headache, I wonder if I could get her degree revoked based on her views on this case.
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 20:57 — agl444

Please, do you realize how

Please, do you realize how dumb you sound. Please atleast try to be professional. What kind of title is that "Idiot Lawyer"? That is personally insulting. Now, I know you will just laugh this off, and go on to the next complaint about your site, but listen to this. YOu are messing with people's futures here. It's not fair to Sanjaya, and it's not fair to the better singers who have gone out. Look at Taylor Hicks. It is personally insulting to him (his album hasn't gone gold yet) that you had people vote for him. He is struggling with his album, and is credited for being the worst idol yet. You must have no life if you find it funny to interfere with others. Those who agree with me, let's start a petition!!!!!! Please repost!!
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 21:31 — mofomisfit

Taylor Hicks album was

Taylor Hicks album was certified platinum on January 17, 2007. It debuted at #2. So, because of our horrible, cruel voting the man has gotten a national ad campaign, a platinum album, has played with Snoop Dogg, Widespread Panic, and Willie Nelson, and has a $750,000.00 book deal for his autobiography. Yeah, he's really doing poorly. He must hate the people who voted him in. I agree, he's probably very insulted that a group of people handed him all that. And I'm sure Sanjaya will be too. I have realized the folly of our ways. We mustn't punish the poor little long haired boy from Seattle with money and fame! Idiot.
Tue, 04/03/2007 - 01:14 — WhowatchesIdol

platinum proof is

platinum proof is here: http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2007/01/18/taylor_hicks_self_titled_debut_album_is_
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 15:20 — angry_ferret_jones

I have some bad news for

I have some bad news for you, Mrs. “My Shit Doesn’t Stink” attorney – I am going to sue MYSELF! HA! By suing myself I will set a court precedence that is even more ridiculous than yours, so when you walk in to court the judge will say “You skanky whore, this matter was already decided in Angry Ferret Jones v. Angry Ferret Jones, now take your aphid-infested cooch the hell out of my courtroom. Ho.
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 14:50 — kmantoni

Unbelievable! My jaw dropped

Unbelievable! My jaw dropped when I heard this. How can a sane person think that way? What a dumb ass! I'd LOVE to see her try to sue this site. I'd definitely be ready to testify that I wasn't under a spell and voted for Sanjaya of my own free-will. What a hose bag! Go back to suing fast food restaurants for serving fattening food!
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 13:51 — cheesesoda

Apparently faulty logic

Apparently faulty logic transcends professions. People were encouraged to vote for President Bush in 2004. Most people seem to hate him, yet the ones who hosted his campaign speeches aren't being arrested for encouraging people. I can tell people to kill themselves. It may not be a nice thing to do, per se, but it falls considerably short of any criminal act. She seems to be willing to do anything for some publicity. Hmm... I wonder if she will take it in the ass.
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 11:16 — NormalFull

This lawyer is an idiot. Is

This lawyer is an idiot. Is she for real??? She is an insult to her profession. Loss of opportunity??? "Where talented contestants like Stephanie Edwards, like Sabrina Sloan are getting knocked off every week because Sanjaya Malakar is surviving." First of all, if you want to be technical, Sanjaya had NOTHING to to with Sabrina Sloan! Why not sue American Idol because they pick 6 guys and 6 girls to make the Top 12 instead of the most talented regardless of gender. Of course, this "most talented" bit is so subjective. This isn't a singing competition, it's a voting competition. Sure, you can attempt to try anything in court but if this ever goes to court, I say counter-sue for legal fees and damaging the reputation of an online community. Even the most jaded people understand that one person out-staying his or her talent on the show only means someone else exiting merely one week sooner than they would have, nothing more. Are you kidding me??? I say this person is a closet worster trying to raise publicity for votefortheworst. I'd LOVE to see this get litigated (provided the defendant can countersue). Can you imagine if this thing went to the Supreme Court??? hahahaha... The premise of this suit it so silly. It would be like Ruben Studdard suing America for not buying his records even after they voted for him. Again, if this civil litigator isn't a closet worster, she's an insult to her profession.
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 11:54 — NormalFull

BTW, I just LOVED the end of

BTW, I just LOVED the end of that segment. Bil O'Reilly (doing his best to contain his sarcasm): "That would be a FAS-CINATING legal case... Moron Lawyer (interrupting): "I'll take it!" (inner fantard excitement bursting through) Bill: "...counselor, thanks for coming in." Bill: "and next we'll wrap things up with the 'most ridiculous item'" (deadpan) AS IF THAT CIVIL LITIGATOR piece wasn't the most ridiculous item! hahahah...... Oh no... there's something even more ridiculous than that??? (I almost thought this was an April Fool's joke but you check youtube and this was a show from late-March)
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 13:10 — Gile

This has got to be an April

This has got to be an April Fool's joke. Can someone check if she's really a lawyer? I mean - there's no way in hell any actual lawyer would think that filing a lawsuit against a website for promoting a contestant that the judges on the show actually selected, would be a good idea.
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 07:34 — Paul

Maybe what all these kids

Maybe what all these kids (or brainless adults) really mean by wanting to SEW this website is that they want to stitch us. Yeah! Like keeping us “in-stitches” laughing daily… hehehe… and they’ve succeeded very well at that, as I keep falling off my chair laughing-out hysterically reading all those threats and crybaby scream of anger… Uh! Uh! Uh! Maybe one of them is indeed this “so-called” Civil Litigator Aidala – Wasn’t that a hoot the other night on O’Reilly!!!? I just couldn’t believe my ears listening to her silly arguments, watching it live. And she thinks she can get a court in the U.S. to listen to her silly justifications for a lawsuit filing? “Hey, Counselor, get a clue, go try Teheran, they might give you the time-of-day”. Or is she perhaps secretly in love with Cowell or Lithgoe? God help us all! Hysterical! BTW, has anyone noticed how subdued and almost resigned Simon was on the last show? It was like: “I can’t control this anymore…” and then, and then… he kind of said it to Sanjaya. Blew me! When I think he gets paid $30 millions to appear on that cheesy show along Paula “Drunken” Abdul and Randy “Yo Dawg” Jackson… I just can’t think straight! Paul Los Angeles
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 05:30 — Antonellas Bask...

Antonella's Basketball: What

Antonella's Basketball: What an annoying bitch Danielle Aidala is. She needs to strip down to her panties and sit on me, then she doesn't need to worry about stupid TV shows and the stupid people who care about them too much.
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 05:29 — TheGodfarter

What a fucking retard.

What a fucking retard. Stern's "spell." How can you blame all the idols being voted off just on Sanjaya?! What about Phil Stacy and his shitass voice, etc...
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 05:07 — Nightwing69

Who the FUCK is this stupid

Who the FUCK is this stupid idiot??? What law school did she attend? University of the Fucking Clueless? Kidz, that stupid asshole knows nothing -- NOTHING -- about the law. And that douchebag O'Liely, of course, puts someone like this dumbass on his lame-ass show. They should fuck and breed "special bus" kids... M-Dawg
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 04:16 — kennethp21

this lawyer couldnt even get

this lawyer couldnt even get the simple facts right, pffft Sanjaya was responsible for Sabrina's boot??? They were in different competitions to begin with. One was in boys vs boys, the other was in girls vs. girls However, I could understand since Sanjaya looks like a girl after all
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 03:11 — queenofblank

She couldn't hold up that

She couldn't hold up that argument for the same reasons Bill pointed out. American Idol is probably getting higher ratings due to the whole VFTW/Howard Stern publicity, and it's not a singing contest anymore! It's just a popularity contest. We don't vote for who sings better. If that were the case, then the people here in San Antonio wouldn't be voting for Haley just to keep her around, we'd be voting for Melinda! That's not what the show is about, and Danielle needs to get that straight before she even tries to sue. It wouldn't be a successful trial. Just a disappointment on her part. It's all about the 1st ammendment! :)
Tue, 04/03/2007 - 16:13 — cry_me_ariver

But it's not even just about

But it's not even just about the first amendment. That's just an obvious reason this line of thought is foolish. The bigger problem this woman is an idiot is that contrary to what she is arguing, neither she/AI/tptb could ever prove tortious interference with a business or with the execution of a contract. The format of the show - a reality show in which people cast votes as often as they like, for whatever reason they like - cannot be said to be interfered with by anyone's voting behavior. Or non-voting behavior. Could Wal-Mart sue people for buying a crappy VCR, when they want everybody to buy a spiffy NEW VCR (one that is *supposed* to sell more...)? No. THEY MADE THE CRAPPY VCR AVAILABLE, so ultimately, any "interference" with the process of selling the anointed VCR begins and ends with the people who made that decision. It's the same with Idol. That would be like saying people you poll are "interfering" with your study if you don't get the responses you want. Sure you *can* sue them, but you won't win, and the negative publicity you'd suffer would be devastating. To keep with the Wal-Mart analogy, they can't even successfully sue people who run websites that say "Boycott Walmart", when the suggestion is to not do business with them at all. This is a far, far cry from what VFTW is doing. In fact, a case could be made that VFTW actually assists the operation of this business, since its membership is encouraged to participate. Very very often, if my cell phone is any indication. As for the lawful execution of a contract section, there is even less merit, since the voting public is under no obligation of any kind to vote within certain parameters. The deal is, they put up the top 24 contestants, and people vote for them. Period. There's no EULA and even if there were, you could not enforce a "vote for whom you want, but you can only choose for reasons X, Y, and Z" clause. In regards to the contestants, they are contracted to have an opportunity to compete for votes on-air. Not votes given to the best, which TPTB could never guarantee due to the caprices of taste; not votes given due to an "honest assessment" which could never be guaranteed for similar and other obvious reasons. The contestants' contracts give them the right to sing on national television in an effort to garner votes. That's all. No website campaigning for votes for specific people can be said to interfere with this, regardless of why they make their suggestion. If people can vote for you or your opponents, then the contract can be fulfilled in a legal manner. End of story.
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 01:59 — dicerotops

I'm sure they were just

I'm sure they were just looking for some eager young lawyer to talk to the show about the merits of a lawsuit. I agreed with Bill (oddly enough) for all but one point: We aren't being malevolent by supporting Sanjaya. On the contrary, we like him when so many others don't. I think this has evolved into supporting the underdog when so many others bash Sanjaya. This case doesn't hold water. I doubt it'd even make it to trial. This is all legitimate, and is blatantly protected under Freedom of Speech. The lawyer compared this site to inciting a riot? How inane is that comment. We aren't yelling "fire" or "bomb," we're just canvassing for Sanjaya. Good luck pressing a lawsuit. Isabel
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 02:30 — raviepoo

You know, I started

You know, I started supporting Sanjaya because of this site. But for some odd reason, I've spent the day bobbing my head to the left and humming, "I love to bathe in your old bathwater...." For the first few weeks the kid looked miserable, as if someone had squished his puppy. Now he's getting out there and having a good time no matter what. He has become fun to watch. He's not a great singer, but he entertains me. Haley, Phil and Chris do not. So no, I'm not supporting him out of malice. I'm supporting him because my Tuesday nights will have a wee bit less light shining on them if he and his hairstylist are voted off of American Idol. Sanjay FTW! I don't care why you vote for him. Just vote for him.
Mon, 04/02/2007 - 18:42 — dicerotops

Here here! I think Sanjaya

Here here! I think Sanjaya is great. Perhaps not a great singer, but he's good all the same. But what is more, he is the most entertaining out there, and not because he can't sing as well as the others, but because he projects his personality in his music. Good for him. I know I won't support any other VFTW idols as much as Sanjaya because he has heart where all the others seem to lack it. Isabel
Sun, 04/01/2007 - 23:04 — sadecou

If this crazy lawyer gets

If this crazy lawyer gets her way, it will be a big waste of my tax dollars.  I resent the fact that this stupid biotch wants to sue Howard Stern and VFTW for hurting American Idol's business!  In fact, American Idol producers should be paying VFTW for making their stupid show bigger than what it should be.  Heck, could you imagine how well the original Star Search would have done with a website like VFTW and Howard Stern? 

I am not a huge Howard Stern fan but in this case he is not doing anything wrong.  Just be rest assured VFTW...I will get my dialing finger ready to dial Sanjaya's phone number this week. 

 In terms of this Danielle Aidala stating that she has a better grip on the Constitution compared to the rest of us motor-morons.  Please be on note lady...my ancestors came to this country in the 1650s as Quakers that were originally French protestants!  Many of the forefathers of this country are indirect relations of mine.  There is NO way that they would have considered using the Constitution to fight against a stupid show like American Idol and maybe you should consider sending yourself back to Siena. 

Sun, 04/01/2007 - 22:17 — kaylysmom1

Are people really so stupid

Are people really so stupid to believe that idol isnt fixed and they are actully a talent show HA my dog is smarter than that and he licks his own butt. Geez people can you really sit there and think that this non-sense they are producing as talent isnt a ratings ploy. As for this website being sued and Howard Stern being sued it just shows they are begging to be seen as FAKE like all other reality shows, Come on people realize what is really going on here on American Idol. Why isn't other sites being deemed as sabotage for encouraging people to vote for a contestant.... kind of makes you wander what is really going on huh?
Sun, 04/01/2007 - 22:06 — Ken

The clip is hilarious. 

The clip is hilarious.  It's funny to see that a about three-quarters of the way through it she begins to realize how ridiculous she sounds.  She must be sitting at home watching Youtube and saying "Oh my God, I can't believe I did that."

By the way, how is voting for Sanjaya subverting the show.  What rules that have been established by the producers are we (Howard Stern, who I can't stand listening to, and VFTW) violating.  Are we hacking into their computer system?  I don't think Howard or VFTW are advocating that.  You are simply encouraging people to vote for a particular contestant.  Other sites are urging people to vote for a particular contestant.  Can we sue them?

This is the story that keeps on giving.

There are other sites to check out....

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=169081091&blogID=245669603&MyToken=9d263060-47f5-4f63-b45a-35c4d3f60a40

http://blog.scenemaker.net/index.php/2007/03/29/reverse-votefortheworst-petition-to-kick-sanjaya-off-of-american-idol/?gclid=CMTtpdbEoosCFRI_UQodJQT9lg

Enjoy.....

Am I a horrible parent by encouraging my 13 year old to vote for Sanjaya???

Sun, 04/01/2007 - 21:30 — dusty56g

I think that she should go

I think that she should go on a starvation diet like that cow on you tube.  American Idol is a fraud people. If you don't agree just attend one of the auditions, all the good people go home and the bad people stay hummmm. I was at the New York ummm actually New Jersey audition and it was a joke!  Keep voting for sanjaya I do at least 300 times! HA, and you cant win a law suit against this website or Howard, I think some of the little kids need to put down the remote and pick up the constitution, and the bill of rights.

Sun, 04/01/2007 - 21:23 — PaganNavyWife

Thats some funny ass

Thats some funny ass shit!

Vote Sanjaya or you shall die...yeah No I havent seen a comment like that anywhere on this site lol we all have free will for god sake, if we fucking want to vote for Sanjaya then well vote for his ass!!!

If VFTW said for for one of the "better" singers no one would have a fucking problem, but no since we vote for someone who everyone else thinks is shitty then were branded as evil and screwing with the votes.

Lets put it this way from the different polls I have seen on who you thik should win Idol, in almost every single one Sanjaya is at the lead or at least number 2! So I highly doubt that its JUST us voting for Sanjaya, there are probably others out there voting for him as much as we are, but no one wants to look at that no they want to blame VFTW for the entire thing and thats just BULL SHIT.

besides its not anything really important its a REALITY TV SHOW! get a grip!

If Children really want to make it big some day someone (their parents) should explain to them that going on a REALITY TV SHOW, isnt the way to make your dreams come true, in order to really make it happens it takes WORK, they have to bust their asses and earn it, not walk in and adition for a reality tv show!

So everyone who keeps saying that VFTW is "crushing" the hopes and dreams of todays youth, and teaching them that their dreams dont matter and its all a joke all because the votes on a REALITY TV show was fixed, are fucking retarded anyways.

Were not to blame, the parents are to blame if they are teaching their children that American Idol is the only chance in hell they have of making their hopes and dreams come true!

I have a 6 year old and she knows my feelings about these reality tv shows like AI and Nashville star, I teach MY daughter that if she wants to be a star shes going to have to bust her ass and work hard for it, going on a reality tv show and having it handed to you is not a way to go about it, and as the past few years have proven, hardly anyone except a couple have even actually made it "big"!

If AI was such a serious competition, then every damn person who wins the fucker would be a big rich star right now recording and selling millions of albums, BUT THEIR NOT.

AI people get over it this show is not about seriously making people stars or making their dreams come true, its about money for the TV SHOW, its about entertainment!

Hell Sheryl Crow even dissed AI lmao so there lol

Sun, 04/01/2007 - 21:11 — idolnomore

I'm just floored...I mean, I

I'm just floored...I mean, I know O'Reilly has gone crackpot in the last half decade or so, but can't believe he'd even put that retarded woman on. I say retarded in the literal sense, as she must have gone to some "special" law school to have such a lack of fundamental understanding of the law.
Sun, 04/01/2007 - 21:25 — Fabiansparkle

By no means am I a fan of

By no means am I a fan of Bill, but once she made the "under Stern's spell" comment, he totally gave up the will to really fight her.  He was bored.

She sounded like a complete and utter idiot. 

 Q: Whats the difference between a lawyer and a catfish?

A: One's a bottom feeder and one's a fish.

Mon, 04/02/2007 - 21:32 — cynmac

Q: Hey, what's the

Q: Hey, what's the difference between a porcupine and a BMW full of lawyers? A: A porcupine has its pricks on the outside!
Tue, 04/03/2007 - 15:39 — cry_me_ariver

Q: What do you call a

Q: What do you call a shuttle full of lawyers "accidentally" plummetting into the sun? A: Guaranteed funding for NASA
Sun, 04/01/2007 - 20:29 — Kooky

Oh, this is beyond stupid.

Oh, this is beyond stupid. For crying out loud, people HERE can't even agree with each other on who the REAL worst one is. Some say Haley, some say Chris R, some say others. And my GOSH, did she READ the little thing on the front page of this website? It doesn't say "You're all getting very sleepy...you're under VFTW's spell...now VOTE FOR SANJAYA!" Nope, it expressly says that VFTW merely ENCOURAGES everyone to vote for Sanjaya! No intimidation, no threats, no promises of great wealth if you do. Just a simple encouragement. Sheeeesh.

 By the way, if you go to AmericanIdol.com and go to the downloads, have a listen to little Sanjaya's stuff. It sounds GOOD! Go listen for yourself, I'm not making it up! He has a good voice, it just never shines through on the show is all.

Sat, 08/29/2009 - 05:34 — merna123

What all things should keep

What all things should keep in mind when Hire a divorce lawyer?

------------------------
Child Molestation Accusations

Sun, 04/01/2007 - 20:23 — cheesemaker

The weird thing is, I

The weird thing is, I actually liked the sound of the 4 seconds of Sanjaya's singing they played in this clip. Am I going crazy or did they go out of their way to find the only 4 seconds that don't sound bad?
12next ›last »