|
Rebel
|
Posted: 3/31/2009 at 2:39 AM
|
|
|
Location: Hidden from view
|
|
SHoebox got beaten again, lets see if they somehow manage to advance again. I would suggest that if they do advance again, that when we vote for us, that we also vote against them; get their opponents vote up into the thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Ultradude
|
|
Posted: 3/31/2009 at 4:11 AM
|
|
|
Location: Thrillerland
|
|
Wow, we're pwning. And I agree with Rebel.
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
buzzylogic
|
|
Posted: 3/31/2009 at 9:18 AM
|
|
|
|
|
shouldn't we be voting for the worst?
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Rainman2000
|
|
Posted: 3/31/2009 at 5:12 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Columbia, Missouri
|
|
>shouldn't we be voting for the worst? That's what I'm saying! Actually, I'm also saying why didn't they make VFTW a #16 seed? Then at least we'd be truly voting for the worst (according to Shoeboxed) all the way through.
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
