I'm sure his PR people were already dying as soon as they found out who they were saddled with.

Watching Madame lose any and all cred is turning out to be quite an entertaining spectacle, I'm enjoying it immensely. Is he out to show THE ENTIRE WORLD that he's a COLLOSAL DOUCHEBAG? The only people in denial are the delusional cows who somehow think they know about being gay because they tard over a flamboyant tranny. I'm having a blast watching the asshole shoot himself in the foot. Good times, good times.

Wow... Love how you pick and choose the parts you print on the websit. Listen Adams failure will not make any of your lives better or less pathetic. Why would you people spend so much time on someone who you do not like???? Also, if Adam has no talent (ridiculous of course) then shouldn't you be for him??? Aren't you vote for the worst???? anyway, in all fairness here a better portion of the article, I notice you left anything positive out:

"Dear Adam," Hicklin writes: "Although you narrowly lost to Kris Allen, you were the real winner for those of us who saw your success as a test of America's growing tolerance. That's why we're proud to have you in this year's Out 100, along with all the other men and women who don't believe their sexuality should be a barrier to success. It's unfortunate, therefore, that your record label and management don't share the same view.

"We're curious whether you know that we made cover offers for you before American Idol was even halfway through its run. Apparently, Out was too gay, even for you. There was the issue of what it would do to your record sales, we were told. Imagine! A gay musician on the cover of a gay magazine. What might the parents think! It's only because this cover is a group shot that includes a straight woman that your team would allow you to be photographed at all--albeit with the caveat that we must avoid making you look 'too gay.' (Is that a medical term? Just curious). Luckily, you seemed unaware that a similar caution was issued to our interviewer."

Hicklin also gripes about hypocrisy in the media, in that straight celebs aggressively court gay audiences these days but actual gay performers often do not. "The irony is that right now it would be easier to get Kris Allen to do a solo cover shoot for us. But only because he's straight," Hicklin writes, adding: "It's odd, because this magazine has done covers with Pete Wentz and Lady Gaga--getting straight men and women to do Out is easy these days. It gives them cred. Getting gay stars like yourself is another matter. Much easier to stick you in Details, where your homosexuality can be neutralized by having you...saying, 'Women are pretty.' So are kittens, Adam, but it doesn't mean you have to make out with them."

In his editor's letter, Hicklin is quick to not lay blame on Adam himself, saying that the controversial Idol was "gracious and frank" in his Out interview and is an undoubtedly important icon in gay culture. "We don't mean to diminish your achievements this year," Hicklin writes to Adam. "That's why you're in this issue. You're a pioneer, an out gay pop idol at the start of his career. Someone has to be first, and we're all counting on you not to mess this up. You have to find your own path and then others can follow. We just hope it's a path that's honest and true and that you choose to surround yourself with people who celebrate your individuality."

It says nothing of Adam being a hypocrite only of his handlers. So FAIL for VFW.

Later suckers and heres to Adams success.

Love,

Your Friendly Sparkly Bull.

I have no idea what you're trying to say, Faceit68.

Paragraph breaks are a wonderful aid to comprehension.

It's laughable that everytime someone calls one of you morons out that you critique there spelling or sentence form.

If you say so, Faceit68. All I know is that when I'm calling someone out, moron or not, I try to make sure my point is at least somewhat coherent.

A good counter-argument isn't very effective if someone can't understand it.

<p>

^^^HA HA and the woman who did the interview has posted her response to the Sparkle Tards:

</p>

<p>

Out's Popnography Link

</p>

To be fair, neither the editor nor the interviewer is saying Lambert is trying to be less gay. The editor says he is unapologetically flamboyant and counts him as one of the 100 in the issue who "doesn't believe their sexuality should be a barrier to success" and they both say he gave a frank and gracious interview.

They ARE saying that he is letting people with insidious motives be in control of his image and he's going to have to decide what to do about that.